26.11.2011 - Pakistán: po útoku vrtulníků NATO 25 mrtvých pakistanských vojáků

Helicopters, NATO attacked the checkpoint of the pakistani army, which has killed at least 25 soldiers and allegedly about 14 other were injured. The territory is located 2.5 km from the afghan border in the tribal territory of the Muhmánd. Islamabád already protested both the NATO command and the US government, also closed up some of the transport corridors.

Source:
aktualne.centrum.cz
www.lidovky.cz.
URL : https://www.valka.cz/26-11-2011-Pakistan-po-utoku-vrtulniku-NATO-25-mrtvych-pakistanskych-vojaku-t122845#418899 Version : 0
According to the Wall Street Journal was before the attack questioned the pakistani side, when excluded on the spot were her unit.

Source:
www.wsj.com
www.novinky.cz.
URL : https://www.valka.cz/26-11-2011-Pakistan-po-utoku-vrtulniku-NATO-25-mrtvych-pakistanskych-vojaku-t122845#419230 Version : 0
The question is načasovanie dotazovania - pakistanská party was the respondent at the time when bola assaulted spoločná Afgansko-american hliadka on afganskom territory - probably from dôvodu, to sa američania presvedčili, or sa accidentally becoming terčom friendly fire (pakistanci could hliadku považovať for hliadku the taliban). Pakistanci confirmed that in mieste attack nemajú units - subsequently sa assaulted hliadka (or posted backup - msm in žiadnom source nenašiel) pokúsila prenasledovať útočníkov - and in the context of prenasledovania (2 hours after prvotnom attack and about 2.5 km in pakistanskom vnútrozemí) stumbled on the camp, who considered the camp militanov. Overovali američania opäť, or in the area where you find the camp of nie's pakistani unit (for 2 hours sa could prenasledovatelia presunúť aj about 10 km simmilar), or sa spoľahli on prvotnú informáciu and požiadali of air attack, who ended up as finished?


Similar to that describes example we.sk from 29.11.2011: www.sme.sk.
URL : https://www.valka.cz/26-11-2011-Pakistan-po-utoku-vrtulniku-NATO-25-mrtvych-pakistanskych-vojaku-t122845#419247 Version : 0
Discussion post Fact post
Attachments

Join us

We believe that there are people with different interests and experiences who could contribute their knowledge and ideas. If you love military history and have experience in historical research, writing articles, editing text, moderating, creating images, graphics or videos, or simply have a desire to contribute to our unique system, you can join us and help us create content that will be interesting and beneficial to other readers.

Find out more